McCann & Ors -v- The Trustees of the Victory Christian Fellowship [2015] IECA 117 (10 June 2015)

McCann & Ors -v- The Trustees of the Victory Christian Fellowship [2015] IECA 117 (10 June 2015)

The court held that the bank's contractual entitlement to appoint receivers was not lost or delayed by the receipt of unauthorised confidential information. The primary reason for the appointment was the defendants' substantial arrears and failure to refinance, not the confidential information. The disclosure of confidential information was not a significant precipitating factor, and equity did not require invalidation or delay of the receivers' appointment.

Citation
[2015] IECA 117
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Paul McCann; Plaintiff/respondent: Patrick Dillon; Plaintiff/respondent: Bank of Scotland PLC; Defendant/appellant: Brendan Hade; Defendant/appellant: Sheila Hade; Defendant/appellant: Gerard Byrne
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
10 June 2015
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appointment of Receivers, Breach of Confidence, Disclosure of Confidential Information, Estoppel, Equitable Relief
Banking Law Equity Contract Law Appointment of Receivers Breach of Confidence Disclosure of Confidential Information Estoppel Equitable Relief

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul McCann

Plaintiff/respondent

Patrick Dillon

Plaintiff/respondent

Bank of Scotland PLC

Plaintiff/respondent

Brendan Hade

Defendant/appellant

Sheila Hade

Defendant/appellant

Gerard Byrne

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appointment of receivers was invalid due to unauthorised disclosure of confidential information
  2. 2 Whether the bank's receipt of confidential information deprived it of the contractual right to appoint receivers
  3. 3 Whether equity could intervene to prevent or invalidate the appointment of receivers

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the bank's contractual entitlement to appoint receivers was not lost or delayed by the receipt of unauthorised confidential information. The primary reason for the appointment was the defendants' substantial arrears and failure to refinance, not the confidential information. The disclosure of confidential information was not a significant precipitating factor, and equity did not require invalidation or delay of the receivers' appointment.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appointment of receivers upheld
  • No orders setting aside receivership