D.P.P. v. Bolger [2003] IEHC 32 (12 February 2003)
An assault charge under s.3 of the Non Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, 1997, even where the victim is a Garda, does not come within No.2 of the First Schedule to the Criminal Justice Act, 1951, as it does not require proof of obstruction of justice or law enforcement; therefore, the accused is not entitled to elect for trial on indictment in such circumstances.
- Citation
- [2003] IEHC 32
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The Director of Public Prosecutions (at the suit of Garda Rosaleen O'Connor); Accused: Christine Bolger
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Consultative Case Stated (criminal) / High Court Determination on Case Stated From District Court
- Outcome
- Questions posed answered in the negative; accused not entitled to elect for trial on indictment under s.3 of the 1997 Act.
- Legal Topics
- Assault, Summary Trial, Right to Elect for Trial on Indictment, Obstruction of Justice, Prosecutorial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Director of Public Prosecutions (at the suit of Garda Rosaleen O'Connor)
Prosecutor
Christine Bolger
Accused
Procedural Posture
Consultative Case Stated (criminal) / High Court Determination on Case Stated From District Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an assault charge under s.3 of the Non Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, 1997, where the victim is a Garda, comes within No.2 of the First Schedule to the Criminal Justice Act, 1951 (obstruction of the administration of justice or enforcement of the law)
- 2 Whether the accused is entitled to elect for trial on indictment in such circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
An assault charge under s.3 of the Non Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, 1997, even where the victim is a Garda, does not come within No.2 of the First Schedule to the Criminal Justice Act, 1951, as it does not require proof of obstruction of justice or law enforcement; therefore, the accused is not entitled to elect for trial on indictment in such circumstances.
Court Disposition
Questions posed answered in the negative; accused not entitled to elect for trial on indictment under s.3 of the 1997 Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment