Savickis -v- Governor of Castlerea Prison & ors [2016] IECA 310 (27 October 2016)
The plaintiff was assaulted by a prison officer while under restraint, constituting excessive and unjustified force and a breach of constitutional rights. Contributory negligence does not apply to the assault claim on these facts. The plaintiff is entitled to compensatory and exemplary damages for the assault and breach of constitutional rights. The use of C & R techniques was negligent due to inadequate training, but the plaintiff's refusal to obey a lawful order justifies a 50% reduction for contributory negligence on the negligence claim. The transfer of the plaintiff while naked did not breach his rights given his refusal to accept covering and the steps taken by officers to protect...
- Citation
- [2016] IECA 310
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Darius Savickis; Defendant/respondent: Governor of Castlerea Prison; Defendant/respondent: Minister for Justice and Equality; Defendant/respondent: The Irish Prison Service; Defendant/respondent: Ireland; Defendant/respondent: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Jury Verdict to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; jury's findings on contributory negligence for assault set aside; damages increased.
- Legal Topics
- Assault by State Agents, Negligence in Prison Context, Breach of Constitutional Rights, Contributory Negligence, Exemplary Damages, Prisoner Dignity, Use of Force by Prison Officers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Darius Savickis
Plaintiff/appellant
Governor of Castlerea Prison
Defendant/respondent
Minister for Justice and Equality
Defendant/respondent
The Irish Prison Service
Defendant/respondent
Ireland
Defendant/respondent
The Attorney General
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Jury Verdict to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff was assaulted by prison officers
- 2 Whether the force used was excessive and disproportionate
- 3 Whether contributory negligence applies to intentional torts such as assault
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was assaulted by a prison officer while under restraint, constituting excessive and unjustified force and a breach of constitutional rights. Contributory negligence does not apply to the assault claim on these facts. The plaintiff is entitled to compensatory and exemplary damages for the assault and breach of constitutional rights. The use of C & R techniques was negligent due to inadequate training, but the plaintiff's refusal to obey a lawful order justifies a 50% reduction for contributory negligence on the negligence claim. The transfer of the plaintiff while naked did not breach his rights given his refusal to accept covering and the steps taken by officers to protect...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; jury's findings on contributory negligence for assault set aside; damages increased.
Orders
- Award of €10,000 in compensatory damages for assault with no reduction for contributory negligence.
- Award of €5,000 in exemplary damages for breach of constitutional rights.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment