McCool Controls and Engineering Ltd v Honeywell Controls Systems Ltd (Approved) [2024] IESC 5 (27 February 2024)

McCool Controls and Engineering Ltd v Honeywell Controls Systems Ltd (Approved) [2024] IESC 5 (27 February 2024)

An assignee of a company's interest in litigation may in principle be permitted to pursue the action by being substituted as plaintiff in lieu of that company, irrespective of whether the purpose of the assignment is to avoid the rule in Battle, provided the assignment complies with statutory and public policy requirements.

Citation
[2024] IESC 5
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Eugene McCool (substituted as plaintiff for McCool Controls and Engineering Limited); Defendant/respondent: Honeywell Control Systems Limited
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
27 February 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed on the narrow ground that substitution is permissible irrespective of assignment purpose.
Legal Topics
Assignment of Cause of Action, Substitution of Parties, Abuse of Process, Public Policy, Right of Access to Courts, Representation of Companies
Company Law Civil Procedure Assignment of Cause of Action Substitution of Parties Abuse of Process Public Policy Right of Access to Courts Representation of Companies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eugene McCool (substituted as plaintiff for McCool Controls and Engineering Limited)

Plaintiff/appellant

Honeywell Control Systems Limited

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an assignee of a company's interest in litigation may be substituted as plaintiff irrespective of the purpose of the assignment
  2. 2 Whether public policy precludes assignment of a cause of action by a company to a natural person to avoid the rule in Battle

Ratio Decidendi

An assignee of a company's interest in litigation may in principle be permitted to pursue the action by being substituted as plaintiff in lieu of that company, irrespective of whether the purpose of the assignment is to avoid the rule in Battle, provided the assignment complies with statutory and public policy requirements.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed on the narrow ground that substitution is permissible irrespective of assignment purpose.

Orders

  • Assignee may be substituted as plaintiff in lieu of company, subject to compliance with statutory and public policy requirements.
  • Case to be taken into case management under a single High Court judge.