Meagher & Anor v. Luke J. Healy Pharmacy Ltd. [2005] IEHC 120 (15 April 2005)
The plaintiffs unreasonably and wrongfully withheld consent to the assignment of the lease to Cellular World Ltd., in breach of the implied statutory covenant under s. 66 of the Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act, 1980. The plaintiffs' actions, including delays and refusals, were motivated by considerations outside the landlord-tenant relationship. The defendant is entitled to damages for losses suffered as a result of this breach, measured from the date the assignment should have been permitted.
- Citation
- [2005] IEHC 120
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: Denis Meagher & Miriam Meagher; Defendant/counterclaimant: Luke J. Healy Pharmacy Limited (later Hickeys Pharmacy (Drogheda) Ltd.)
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- High Court Civil Action / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Declaration for defendant/counterclaimant; damages awarded
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Lease, Withholding of Consent, Repairing Covenants, Damages for Unreasonable Withholding of Consent, Implied Statutory Covenants
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Denis Meagher & Miriam Meagher
Plaintiffs
Luke J. Healy Pharmacy Limited (later Hickeys Pharmacy (Drogheda) Ltd.)
Defendant/counterclaimant
Procedural Posture
High Court Civil Action / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs (landlords) unreasonably withheld consent to assignment of lease to proposed assignees, particularly Cellular World Ltd.
- 2 Whether the defendant (tenant) is entitled to damages for losses suffered due to unreasonable withholding of consent
- 3 Whether the plaintiffs' actions were motivated by considerations outside the landlord-tenant relationship
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs unreasonably and wrongfully withheld consent to the assignment of the lease to Cellular World Ltd., in breach of the implied statutory covenant under s. 66 of the Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act, 1980. The plaintiffs' actions, including delays and refusals, were motivated by considerations outside the landlord-tenant relationship. The defendant is entitled to damages for losses suffered as a result of this breach, measured from the date the assignment should have been permitted.
Court Disposition
Declaration for defendant/counterclaimant; damages awarded
Orders
- Declaration that plaintiffs unreasonably and wrongfully withheld consent to assignment to Cellular World Ltd.
- Damages to defendant for rent, rates, and agent's fees from 20 October 1998 to assumption by Esat of tenant's interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment