Permanent TSB Plc -v- Langan [2016] IECA 229 (28 July 2016)
The Circuit Court has no jurisdiction to hear possession proceedings in respect of domestic dwellings that are unrateable under the Valuation Act 2001, unless the case falls within the exceptions provided by Part 10 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009 (for mortgages created after 1 December 2009) or s. 3 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2013 (for principal private residences). As neither exception applies, the Circuit Court lacked jurisdiction in this case.
- Citation
- [2016] IECA 229
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Respondent: Permanent TSB PLC; Defendant / Appellant: David Langan
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Case Stated (appeal on Jurisdiction) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Case Stated From High Court
- Outcome
- Circuit Court lacked jurisdiction; questions answered as per judgment.
- Legal Topics
- Circuit Court Jurisdiction, Rateable Valuation, Possession Proceedings, Valuation Act 2001, Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2013
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Permanent TSB PLC
Plaintiff / Respondent
David Langan
Defendant / Appellant
Procedural Posture
Case Stated (appeal on Jurisdiction) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Case Stated From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Circuit Court has jurisdiction to hear possession proceedings for unrateable domestic dwellings under the Valuation Act 2001
- 2 Interpretation of s. 22(1) of the Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act 1961 and the Third Schedule
- 3 Effect of the Valuation Act 2001 on Circuit Court jurisdiction in land matters
Ratio Decidendi
The Circuit Court has no jurisdiction to hear possession proceedings in respect of domestic dwellings that are unrateable under the Valuation Act 2001, unless the case falls within the exceptions provided by Part 10 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009 (for mortgages created after 1 December 2009) or s. 3 of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2013 (for principal private residences). As neither exception applies, the Circuit Court lacked jurisdiction in this case.
Court Disposition
Circuit Court lacked jurisdiction; questions answered as per judgment.
Orders
- Questions stated by the High Court answered: (1) Yes (subject to Q3); (2) No; (3) Circuit Court not entitled to proceed to judgment in respect of unrateable domestic dwellings unless exceptions apply; (4) and (5) do not arise.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment