Permanent TSB plc -v- Langan & anor [2017] IESC 71 (12 December 2017)
The Circuit Court has jurisdiction to entertain possession proceedings in respect of property that does not have a rateable valuation, as the statutory exclusion only applies where the property actually has a rateable valuation exceeding €253.95. The absence of a rateable valuation does not exclude jurisdiction. Jurisdiction must be established by evidence that the property does not have a rateable valuation or that any such valuation does not exceed the threshold. The constitutional requirement of 'limited' jurisdiction is satisfied by the defined category of case.
- Citation
- [2017] IESC 71
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Permanent TSB plc; Defendant/respondent: David Langan; Intervenor: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Court of Appeal, on Case Stated From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Circuit Court Jurisdiction, Rateable Valuation, Possession Proceedings, Interpretation of Courts (supplemental Provisions) Act 1961, Valuation Act 2001, Constitutional Limits on Court Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Permanent TSB plc
Plaintiff/appellant
David Langan
Defendant/respondent
The Attorney General
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Court of Appeal, on Case Stated From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Circuit Court has jurisdiction in possession proceedings concerning residential property with no rateable valuation under the Valuation Act 2001
- 2 Proper interpretation of the jurisdictional threshold in the Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act 1961 Third Schedule
- 3 Whether the absence of a rateable valuation excludes Circuit Court jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The Circuit Court has jurisdiction to entertain possession proceedings in respect of property that does not have a rateable valuation, as the statutory exclusion only applies where the property actually has a rateable valuation exceeding €253.95. The absence of a rateable valuation does not exclude jurisdiction. Jurisdiction must be established by evidence that the property does not have a rateable valuation or that any such valuation does not exceed the threshold. The constitutional requirement of 'limited' jurisdiction is satisfied by the defined category of case.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Questions in the case stated answered as per section 8 of the judgment: Circuit Court jurisdiction is not excluded by absence of rateable valuation; jurisdiction exists unless property has a rateable valuation exceeding €253.95; jurisdiction must be established by admissible evidence of rateable valuation or its...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment