Representatives of Chadwick and Goff v. Fingall County Council [2003] IEHC 69 (17 October 2003)
Compensation for injurious affection under section 63 of the Lands Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 is limited to injury caused by works on and user of the land actually acquired from the claimants. The statutory scheme does not provide compensation for depreciation caused by the use of other lands acquired for the public undertaking. This interpretation is consistent with the Constitution, as the loss claimed is not a compensatable loss at common law, and the limitation is necessary to ensure fairness and equality before the law.
- Citation
- [2003] IEHC 69
- Parties
- Claimants: Representatives of Terence Chadwick Deceased and Sheelagh Davis Goff; Respondents: Fingal County Council
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Consultative Case Stated (case Stated for Opinion of the High Court) / High Court Judgment on Case Stated
- Outcome
- Question answered in the affirmative; compensation for injurious affection is limited to injury caused by works on and user of the land actually acquired from the claimants.
- Legal Topics
- Compensation for Injurious Affection, Statutory Interpretation, Equality Before the Law, Constitutional Property Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Representatives of Terence Chadwick Deceased and Sheelagh Davis Goff
Claimants
Fingal County Council
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Consultative Case Stated (case Stated for Opinion of the High Court) / High Court Judgment on Case Stated
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether compensation for injurious affection under section 63 of the Lands Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 is limited to injury caused by works on and user of land actually acquired from the claimants, or extends to all depreciation caused by the public scheme.
Ratio Decidendi
Compensation for injurious affection under section 63 of the Lands Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 is limited to injury caused by works on and user of the land actually acquired from the claimants. The statutory scheme does not provide compensation for depreciation caused by the use of other lands acquired for the public undertaking. This interpretation is consistent with the Constitution, as the loss claimed is not a compensatable loss at common law, and the limitation is necessary to ensure fairness and equality before the law.
Court Disposition
Question answered in the affirmative; compensation for injurious affection is limited to injury caused by works on and user of the land actually acquired from the claimants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment