Landers -v- Dixon [2015] IECA 155 (15 July 2015)
The High Court erred in measuring costs at €20,000 without providing the parties, especially the adversely affected party, an opportunity to make submissions or provide relevant material, and without an objectively defensible basis, particularly given the complexity and number of applications in the case. The normal order for taxation of costs should have been made.
- Citation
- [2015] IECA 155
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Oliver Landers; Respondent/respondent: Raymond Dixon
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against High Court Order Measuring Costs
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Measurement of Costs, Taxation of Costs, Discretion of Court in Awarding Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oliver Landers
Plaintiff/appellant
Raymond Dixon
Respondent/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against High Court Order Measuring Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court properly exercised its discretion to measure costs under Ord. 99, r.5(2)(a) instead of ordering taxation of costs
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court erred in measuring costs at €20,000 without providing the parties, especially the adversely affected party, an opportunity to make submissions or provide relevant material, and without an objectively defensible basis, particularly given the complexity and number of applications in the case. The normal order for taxation of costs should have been made.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order for payment of plaintiff’s taxed costs substituted for High Court order measuring costs at €20,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment