Costello Transport Ltd -v- Singh [2016] IESC 72 (15 December 2016)

Costello Transport Ltd -v- Singh [2016] IESC 72 (15 December 2016)

Mr. Singh was properly treated as a party to the proceedings because the application for leave to appeal was filed in his name and he failed to provide any credible explanation or evidence to the contrary. He is liable for costs as the default position under the Statutory Practice Direction applies, and no good reason was provided to depart from it.

Citation
[2016] IESC 72
Parties
Applicant/respondent: Costello Transport Limited; Respondent/appellant: Nehall Singh
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
15 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Determination Following Failed Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Costs awarded against Mr. Singh in favour of Costello Transport for the failed application for leave to appeal, including costs of the oral hearing.
Legal Topics
Costs, Party Status, Assignment of Cause of Action, Liquidator Removal
Civil Procedure Insolvency Costs Party Status Assignment of Cause of Action Liquidator Removal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Costello Transport Limited

Applicant/respondent

Nehall Singh

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Costs Determination Following Failed Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mr. Singh was properly a party to the proceedings for the purposes of costs
  2. 2 Whether an application for leave to appeal was filed with Mr. Singh's authority
  3. 3 Whether costs should be awarded against Mr. Singh for the failed application for leave to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Mr. Singh was properly treated as a party to the proceedings because the application for leave to appeal was filed in his name and he failed to provide any credible explanation or evidence to the contrary. He is liable for costs as the default position under the Statutory Practice Direction applies, and no good reason was provided to depart from it.

Court Disposition

Costs awarded against Mr. Singh in favour of Costello Transport for the failed application for leave to appeal, including costs of the oral hearing.

Orders

  • Order for costs in favour of Costello Transport and against Mr. Singh for the failed application for leave to appeal.
  • Costs to include costs of the oral hearing.