Gerard Harrahill v Doyle (Unapproved) [2024] IECA 72 (09 April 2024)

Gerard Harrahill v Doyle (Unapproved) [2024] IECA 72 (09 April 2024)

The respondent was entirely successful in the appeal, and the appellant failed to identify any factor in the conduct of the respondent or the nature and circumstances of the case to justify a departure from the general rule that costs follow the event. Arguments regarding overpayments, hybrid hearing, and delay in judgment delivery do not warrant refusal of costs.

Citation
[2024] IECA 72
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Gerard Harrahill; Defendant/appellant: Thomas Doyle
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
09 April 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Ruling on Costs After Dismissal of Appeal
Outcome
Respondent awarded all costs of appeal, including additional costs for written submissions in reply to appellant's submissions on costs.
Legal Topics
Costs of Appeal, Unpaid Taxes, Statutory Limitation Periods, Hybrid Hearings, Delay in Judgment Delivery
Tax Law Civil Procedure Costs of Appeal Unpaid Taxes Statutory Limitation Periods Hybrid Hearings Delay in Judgment Delivery

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gerard Harrahill

Plaintiff/respondent

Thomas Doyle

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Ruling on Costs After Dismissal of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether costs should be awarded against the unsuccessful appellant after dismissal of appeal
  2. 2 Whether alleged overpayments, hybrid hearing, or delay in judgment justify departure from general rule on costs

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent was entirely successful in the appeal, and the appellant failed to identify any factor in the conduct of the respondent or the nature and circumstances of the case to justify a departure from the general rule that costs follow the event. Arguments regarding overpayments, hybrid hearing, and delay in judgment delivery do not warrant refusal of costs.

Court Disposition

Respondent awarded all costs of appeal, including additional costs for written submissions in reply to appellant's submissions on costs.

Orders

  • Appellant to pay all costs of the appeal to the respondent, including additional costs incurred in replying to appellant's submissions on costs.