Nolan -v- Murphy [2005] IESC 17 (18 March 2005)
The jury's award of €600,000 was disproportionate and excessive given the range of comparable awards and the need for proportionality. The appropriate award, considering the seriousness of the injuries but not the worst-case scenario, is €350,000.
- Citation
- [2005] IESC 17
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Michelle Nolan; Defendant/appellant: Simon Murphy
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Jury Award
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court award varied
- Legal Topics
- Damages for Sexual Abuse, Assessment of General Damages, Proportionality in Awards, Civil Liability for Sexual Assault, Jury Awards in Personal Injury Cases
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michelle Nolan
Plaintiff/respondent
Simon Murphy
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Jury Award
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate level of general damages for a continuum of sexual abuse culminating in rape of a teenager?
- 2 Was the jury's award of €600,000 excessive and disproportionate?
Ratio Decidendi
The jury's award of €600,000 was disproportionate and excessive given the range of comparable awards and the need for proportionality. The appropriate award, considering the seriousness of the injuries but not the worst-case scenario, is €350,000.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court award varied
Orders
- Set aside the jury award of €600,000 in general damages
- Substitute an award of €350,000 in general damages to the plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment