Nolan -v- Laurence Lounge t/a Grace's Pub [2018] IEHC 352 (08 June 2018)

Nolan -v- Laurence Lounge t/a Grace's Pub [2018] IEHC 352 (08 June 2018)

The plaintiff's account of the incident was preferred over the defendant's. The words and conduct of the barman were defamatory, published loudly in the presence of others, and implied fraudulent conduct. The defence of truth was not established. The defence of qualified privilege failed due to excessive publication and malice. Damages were appropriate.

Citation
[2018] IEHC 352
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Leonard Nolan; Defendant/appellant: Laurence Lounge t/a Grace’s Pub
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
08 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Circuit Court Appeal / High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; judgment for plaintiff upheld.
Legal Topics
Defamation, Qualified Privilege, Truth Defence, Malice, Publication, Damages
Defamation Tort Law Qualified Privilege Truth Defence Malice Publication Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Leonard Nolan

Plaintiff/respondent

Laurence Lounge t/a Grace’s Pub

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Circuit Court Appeal / High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's words and conduct were defamatory
  2. 2 Whether the defence of truth was established
  3. 3 Whether the defence of qualified privilege applies

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff's account of the incident was preferred over the defendant's. The words and conduct of the barman were defamatory, published loudly in the presence of others, and implied fraudulent conduct. The defence of truth was not established. The defence of qualified privilege failed due to excessive publication and malice. Damages were appropriate.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; judgment for plaintiff upheld.

Orders

  • Damages of €5,000 awarded to plaintiff.
  • Defendant's appeal dismissed.