Tracey v Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Ltd & Ors [2019] IESC 68 (30 July 2019)
The Supreme Court held that the President of the High Court erred in the order made, and that the same principles as in the Irish Times judgment apply. The appeal was allowed and the matter remitted to the High Court for re-hearing.
- Citation
- [2019] IESC 68
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Kevin Tracey; Defendant/respondent: Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Limited; Defendant/respondent: Gerry O'Regan; Defendant/respondent: Stephen Rea; Defendant/respondent: Tim Healy
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Defamation by Newspaper, Application of Probation of Offenders Act 1907, Remittal for Re Hearing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kevin Tracey
Plaintiff/appellant
Independent Newspapers (Ireland) Limited
Defendant/respondent
Gerry O'Regan
Defendant/respondent
Stephen Rea
Defendant/respondent
Tim Healy
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the article published by the respondent was false and defamatory
- 2 Whether the application of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1907, constitutes a criminal conviction
- 3 Whether the High Court erred in its order regarding the appellant's claim
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court held that the President of the High Court erred in the order made, and that the same principles as in the Irish Times judgment apply. The appeal was allowed and the matter remitted to the High Court for re-hearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Matter remitted to the High Court for re-hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment