Electricity Supply Board and Eirgrid plc -v- Killross Properties Ltd [2018] IESC 22 (18 April 2018)
Section 9 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1927 permits the Board (ESB) to authorise its Chief Executive to exercise the Board's statutory power under that section, including authorising other officers to act. The Chief Executive's authorisation of Mr. Waldron to serve the s.53 notice was a lawful exercise of the Board's power, not an unlawful sub-delegation. The ESB's statutory power under s.53 was not abdicated or unlawfully delegated by virtue of its agreements or regulatory obligations with Eirgrid or ESB Networks Ltd.
- Citation
- [2018] IESC 22
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Electricity Supply Board; Plaintiff/appellant: Eirgrid plc; Defendant/respondent: Killross Properties Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal and Cross Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Delegation of Statutory Powers, Electricity Infrastructure, Wayleave Notices, Corporate Statutory Authority, Regulatory Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Electricity Supply Board
Plaintiff/appellant
Eirgrid plc
Plaintiff/appellant
Killross Properties Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.9 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1927 permits the ESB to authorise its Chief Executive to exercise its statutory power under that section
- 2 Whether the ESB was precluded from exercising its power under s.53 of the 1927 Act due to agreements and regulatory changes
Ratio Decidendi
Section 9 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1927 permits the Board (ESB) to authorise its Chief Executive to exercise the Board's statutory power under that section, including authorising other officers to act. The Chief Executive's authorisation of Mr. Waldron to serve the s.53 notice was a lawful exercise of the Board's power, not an unlawful sub-delegation. The ESB's statutory power under s.53 was not abdicated or unlawfully delegated by virtue of its agreements or regulatory obligations with Eirgrid or ESB Networks Ltd.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- Order of the Court of Appeal set aside
- Appeal from the High Court dismissed in its entirety
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment