M & ors -v- Minister for Justice and Equality & ors [2018] IESC 14 (07 March 2018)
The Minister for Justice is required to consider, in a deportation revocation application, the likely future rights of a child who will be born, including those rights the child will acquire on birth as an Irish citizen. However, the unborn does not have constitutional rights beyond the right to life under Article 40.3.3 prior to birth, and Article 42A does not extend to the unborn. The High Court erred in holding otherwise.
- Citation
- [2018] IESC 14
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: I. R. M.; Applicant/respondent: S. J. R.; Applicant/respondent: S. O. M. (A minor suing by her Mother and Next Friend S. J. R.); Respondent/appellant: The Minister for Justice and Equality; Respondent/appellant: Ireland; Respondent/appellant: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (leapfrog From High Court) / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Deportation, Rights of the Unborn, Constitutional Interpretation, Revocation of Deportation Orders, Irish Citizenship, Non Marital Family Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
I. R. M.
Applicant/respondent
S. J. R.
Applicant/respondent
S. O. M. (A minor suing by her Mother and Next Friend S. J. R.)
Applicant/respondent
The Minister for Justice and Equality
Respondent/appellant
Ireland
Respondent/appellant
The Attorney General
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (leapfrog From High Court) / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister for Justice is required to consider the position of an unborn child in a deportation revocation application under s.3(11) of the Immigration Act 1999.
- 2 Whether the constitutional rights of an unborn child, or the rights the child will acquire on birth, must be considered by the Minister.
- 3 Whether the unborn enjoy constitutional and other rights independent of the right to life under Article 40.3.3.
Ratio Decidendi
The Minister for Justice is required to consider, in a deportation revocation application, the likely future rights of a child who will be born, including those rights the child will acquire on birth as an Irish citizen. However, the unborn does not have constitutional rights beyond the right to life under Article 40.3.3 prior to birth, and Article 42A does not extend to the unborn. The High Court erred in holding otherwise.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Declaration that the Minister must consider the likely future rights of a child to be born in deportation revocation applications, but not broader constitutional rights of the unborn prior to birth.
- No further relief granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment