G -v- The Department of Social Protection [2015] IEHC 419 (07 July 2015)

G -v- The Department of Social Protection [2015] IEHC 419 (07 July 2015)

The refusal to grant maternity or adoptive benefit to the appellant, a genetic mother via surrogacy, does not constitute discrimination under the Equal Status Acts because the statutory schemes lawfully limit eligibility to women who give birth or adopt, as defined by Irish law. The Department of Social Protection is bound by statute and cannot extend benefits beyond legislative provisions. The exclusion of surrogacy cases is a legislative gap, not actionable discrimination under the Act. The Department's actions were not based on disability, gender, or family status, but on statutory criteria. Reasonable accommodation does not require the creation of new benefits. The court cannot...

Citation
[2015] IEHC 419
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: G.; Defendant/respondent: The Department of Social Protection
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
07 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Appeal (equal Status Acts) / High Court Appeal on Point of Law From Circuit Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Disability Discrimination, Gender Discrimination, Family Status Discrimination, Surrogacy and Legal Motherhood, Statutory Interpretation, Reasonable Accommodation, Ultra Vires, Indirect Discrimination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

G.

Plaintiff/appellant

The Department of Social Protection

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (equal Status Acts) / High Court Appeal on Point of Law From Circuit Court

  1. 1 Whether refusal to grant maternity/adoptive benefit to a genetic mother via surrogacy constitutes discrimination under the Equal Status Acts 2000-2011 on grounds of disability, gender, or family status
  2. 2 Whether the Department of Social Protection provides a 'service' within the meaning of the Act
  3. 3 Whether the statutory criteria for maternity/adoptive benefit amount to direct or indirect discrimination

Ratio Decidendi

The refusal to grant maternity or adoptive benefit to the appellant, a genetic mother via surrogacy, does not constitute discrimination under the Equal Status Acts because the statutory schemes lawfully limit eligibility to women who give birth or adopt, as defined by Irish law. The Department of Social Protection is bound by statute and cannot extend benefits beyond legislative provisions. The exclusion of surrogacy cases is a legislative gap, not actionable discrimination under the Act. The Department's actions were not based on disability, gender, or family status, but on statutory criteria. Reasonable accommodation does not require the creation of new benefits. The court cannot...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed. The decision of the Circuit Court upholding the Equality Tribunal's dismissal of the complaint is affirmed.