Kelleher -v- An Post [2016] IECA 195 (28 June 2016)

Kelleher -v- An Post [2016] IECA 195 (28 June 2016)

The appellant, having knowingly participated in the Appendix IV disciplinary procedure without objection until the adverse decision, is estopped from challenging its validity. As the facts were admitted by the appellant, there was no breach of fair procedures in not providing internal reports. There was no evidence of bias or pre-judgment arising from contact between decision-makers and third parties. However, An Post was not entitled to unilaterally determine and recover 50% of the missing funds as a liquidated demand; any such claim must be pursued as unliquidated damages in separate proceedings.

Citation
[2016] IECA 195
Parties
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tom Kelleher; Defendant / Respondent: An Post
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
28 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed in part, allowed in part
Legal Topics
Disciplinary Procedures, Fair Procedures, Employment Termination, Contractual Liability, Natural Justice
Employment Law Contract Law Administrative Law Disciplinary Procedures Fair Procedures Employment Termination Contractual Liability Natural Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tom Kelleher

Plaintiff / Appellant

An Post

Defendant / Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the disciplinary procedure (Appendix IV) applied by An Post was appropriate and fair
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was entitled to copies of internal reports during the disciplinary process
  3. 3 Whether there was bias or pre-judgment due to contact between decision-makers and third parties

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant, having knowingly participated in the Appendix IV disciplinary procedure without objection until the adverse decision, is estopped from challenging its validity. As the facts were admitted by the appellant, there was no breach of fair procedures in not providing internal reports. There was no evidence of bias or pre-judgment arising from contact between decision-makers and third parties. However, An Post was not entitled to unilaterally determine and recover 50% of the missing funds as a liquidated demand; any such claim must be pursued as unliquidated damages in separate proceedings.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed in part, allowed in part

Orders

  • Declaration that An Post is not entitled to unilaterally specify and recover the sum claimed for missing moneys; such claim must be pursued in substantive proceedings for unliquidated damages.
  • Otherwise, the appeal is dismissed and the High Court decision is affirmed.