Ivers v The Commissioner of an Garda Siochana (Approved) [2022] IECA 206 (18 August 2022)
Section 14(2) of the Garda Síochána Act 2005 permits the Commissioner to initiate dismissal proceedings on a preliminary opinion, provided the member is informed of the basis and given an opportunity to respond before any final determination. The process had not reached a final determination, and the application for judicial review was premature as the process had not gone irremediably wrong. The Commissioner's letter was a first-stage opinion, not a binding determination, and Garda Ivers retained the right to challenge the facts and the process before any dismissal could occur.
- Citation
- [2022] IECA 206
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Adrian Ivers; Respondent/respondent: The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From High Court Dismissal of Judicial Review Application
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disciplinary Procedures, Summary Dismissal, Natural Justice, Fair Procedures, Judicial Review, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adrian Ivers
Applicant/appellant
The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána
Respondent/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From High Court Dismissal of Judicial Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Commissioner of An Garda Síochána can invoke section 14 of the Garda Síochána Act 2005 to dismiss a member without a full disciplinary inquiry when facts are in dispute
- 2 Whether the Commissioner's letter constituted a final determination in breach of fair procedures and natural justice
- 3 Interaction between section 14 of the 2005 Act and the Garda Síochána (Discipline) Regulations 2007
Ratio Decidendi
Section 14(2) of the Garda Síochána Act 2005 permits the Commissioner to initiate dismissal proceedings on a preliminary opinion, provided the member is informed of the basis and given an opportunity to respond before any final determination. The process had not reached a final determination, and the application for judicial review was premature as the process had not gone irremediably wrong. The Commissioner's letter was a first-stage opinion, not a binding determination, and Garda Ivers retained the right to challenge the facts and the process before any dismissal could occur.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed; the High Court's dismissal of the judicial review application is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment