P J Carroll and Company Limited & Ors v The Minister for Health and Children & Ors [2005] IEHC 432 (09 December 2005)
The documents sought by the defendants are not relevant to the issues to be tried because they were not before the Oireachtas when the legislation was enacted and are immaterial to the justification of the legislative measures. Even if relevant, the defendants have not demonstrated that discovery is necessary for the fair disposal of the proceedings or to save costs, as extensive expert evidence has already been prepared without recourse to the documents sought. The application for discovery is refused.
- Citation
- [2005] IEHC 432
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: PJ Carroll and Company Limited, John Player and Sons Limited, Van Nelle (Ireland), Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken GmbH, Gallaher (Dublin) Limited, Societe Nationale d’Exploitation Industrielle des Tabacs et Allumettes (SEITA), Gerry Lawlor and Conor Fuller; Defendants: The Minister for Health and Children, Ireland, The Attorney General and The Office of Tobacco Control
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial / Interlocutory Application for Discovery
- Outcome
- Application for discovery refused
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Proportionality, Legislative Justification, Advertising Regulation, Public Health, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PJ Carroll and Company Limited, John Player and Sons Limited, Van Nelle (Ireland), Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken GmbH, Gallaher (Dublin) Limited, Societe Nationale d’Exploitation Industrielle des Tabacs et Allumettes (SEITA), Gerry Lawlor and Conor Fuller
Plaintiffs
The Minister for Health and Children, Ireland, The Attorney General and The Office of Tobacco Control
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Interlocutory Application for Discovery
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the documents sought by the defendants are relevant and necessary for the fair disposal of the proceedings or to save costs under Order 31, r. 12 of the Rules of the Superior Courts
- 2 Whether discovery is appropriate in proceedings seeking declaratory relief on the constitutionality and validity of legislation
- 3 Whether documents not before the Oireachtas at the time of enactment can be relevant to the justification of legislative measures
Ratio Decidendi
The documents sought by the defendants are not relevant to the issues to be tried because they were not before the Oireachtas when the legislation was enacted and are immaterial to the justification of the legislative measures. Even if relevant, the defendants have not demonstrated that discovery is necessary for the fair disposal of the proceedings or to save costs, as extensive expert evidence has already been prepared without recourse to the documents sought. The application for discovery is refused.
Court Disposition
Application for discovery refused
Orders
- No order for discovery of the categories of documents sought by the defendants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment