Thema International Fund PLC v HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Ire.) Ltd & ors [2013] IESC 3 (25 January 2013)
The 2009 amendment to Order 31, r.12 of the Rules of the Superior Courts, adding the word 'procurement', did not extend the scope of discovery beyond documents in a party's possession or legal power. The High Court's order requiring discovery of documents held by related companies outside the jurisdiction exceeded the permissible scope of discovery. The appeal was allowed and the High Court's order set aside.
- Citation
- [2013] IESC 3
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Thema International Fund plc; Defendant/appellant: HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Ireland) Limited; Third Party: Thema Asset Management Limited; Third Party: 2020 Medici AG
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Order on Discovery
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Corporate Groups, Jurisdiction, Rules of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thema International Fund plc
Plaintiff/respondent
HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Ireland) Limited
Defendant/appellant
Thema Asset Management Limited
Third Party
2020 Medici AG
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Order on Discovery
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2009 amendment to Order 31, r.12 of the Rules of the Superior Courts extends discovery obligations to documents held by related companies not party to the proceedings and outside the jurisdiction;
- 2 Whether the inclusion of 'procurement' in the rule alters the scope of discovery beyond 'possession or power'.
- 3 Whether the High Court was correct to order discovery of documents held by HSBC group entities outside Ireland.
Ratio Decidendi
The 2009 amendment to Order 31, r.12 of the Rules of the Superior Courts, adding the word 'procurement', did not extend the scope of discovery beyond documents in a party's possession or legal power. The High Court's order requiring discovery of documents held by related companies outside the jurisdiction exceeded the permissible scope of discovery. The appeal was allowed and the High Court's order set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside
Orders
- Order for further and better discovery made on 27th July, 2012, discharged
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment