Bazsont LTD T/A Starbucks (Liffey Valley) v BVK Highstreet Retail Liffey Property LTD (Approved) [2021] IEHC 773 (10 December 2021)
Discovery of documents relating to the applicability of the 2010 Lease Renunciation to the 2016 Lease is necessary and proportionate, except for communications constituting pre-contractual negotiations; discovery of documents relating to legal assistance received by the defendant in connection with the 2016 Lease is not relevant as no such matter is pleaded.
- Citation
- [2021] IEHC 773
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Bazsont Limited Trading as Starbucks (Liffey Valley); Defendant/respondent: BVK Highstreet Retail Liffey Property Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Circuit Court Order on Discovery / High Court Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Contractual Interpretation, Renunciation of Tenancy, Statutory Tenancy Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bazsont Limited Trading as Starbucks (Liffey Valley)
Plaintiff/appellant
BVK Highstreet Retail Liffey Property Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Circuit Court Order on Discovery / High Court Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether discovery of documents relating to the applicability of the 2010 Lease Renunciation to the 2016 Lease is necessary and proportionate
- 2 Whether discovery of documents relating to legal assistance received by the defendant in connection with the 2016 Lease is relevant and necessary
Ratio Decidendi
Discovery of documents relating to the applicability of the 2010 Lease Renunciation to the 2016 Lease is necessary and proportionate, except for communications constituting pre-contractual negotiations; discovery of documents relating to legal assistance received by the defendant in connection with the 2016 Lease is not relevant as no such matter is pleaded.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Discovery of documents in category 3 ordered, excluding communications in the nature of pre-contractual negotiations leading to the 2016 deed of variation
- Discovery of documents in category 4 refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment