McMullen -v- Kennedy [2008] IESC 69 (17 December 2008)
The appellant failed to provide any evidence of fraud or illegality sufficient to override legal professional privilege. The documents in question remain privileged, and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2008] IESC 69
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Michael Colin McMullen; Defendant/respondent: Giles J Kennedy practising as Giles J Kennedy and Company Solicitors
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Refusal of Inspection of Documents
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Discovery of Documents, Legal Professional Privilege, Fraud Exception to Privilege
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Colin McMullen
Plaintiff/appellant
Giles J Kennedy practising as Giles J Kennedy and Company Solicitors
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Refusal of Inspection of Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether legal professional privilege can be set aside to allow inspection of documents alleged to conceal unlawful or fraudulent conduct
- 2 Whether the appellant established sufficient evidence of fraud or illegality to override privilege
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to provide any evidence of fraud or illegality sufficient to override legal professional privilege. The documents in question remain privileged, and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order upheld except as to the letter of 17 May 1989, which is available to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment