Gilroy -v- Flynn [2004] IESC 98 (03 December 2004)

Gilroy -v- Flynn [2004] IESC 98 (03 December 2004)

Despite inordinate and inexcusable delay by the plaintiff, the uncontradicted assertion that the case would proceed on assessment only, combined with the balance of justice, justified allowing the appeal and granting a final opportunity to file a statement of claim within one week, but any further delay would risk dismissal.

Citation
[2004] IESC 98
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Mark John Gilroy; Defendant/respondent: Mary Flynn
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
03 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Delay in Litigation, Rules of the Superior Courts, Judicial Discretion, Assessment of Damages
Civil Procedure Personal Injury Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Delay in Litigation Rules of the Superior Courts Judicial Discretion Assessment of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mark John Gilroy

Plaintiff/appellant

Mary Flynn

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Personal Injuries Action / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether inordinate and inexcusable delay by the plaintiff justifies dismissal of the action for want of prosecution
  2. 2 Whether the balance of justice requires the action to proceed despite delay
  3. 3 Effect of recent amendments to procedural rules on judicial discretion in cases of delay

Ratio Decidendi

Despite inordinate and inexcusable delay by the plaintiff, the uncontradicted assertion that the case would proceed on assessment only, combined with the balance of justice, justified allowing the appeal and granting a final opportunity to file a statement of claim within one week, but any further delay would risk dismissal.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside

Orders

  • Plaintiff granted one week from judgment date to file statement of claim
  • Any further delay will risk dismissal of the action