Histon -v- Shannon Foynes Port Authority [2004] IESC 107 (17 December 2004)

Histon -v- Shannon Foynes Port Authority [2004] IESC 107 (17 December 2004)

The appellant's statutory right not to be dismissed without the sanction of the Minister for the Marine survived the transfer to the new company, as there was no express statutory provision abolishing this right. Therefore, the purported dismissal was invalid and the appellant remains in office. The reporting relationship to the chief executive is not a protected term of employment.

Citation
[2004] IESC 107
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Senan Histon; Defendant/respondent: Shannon Foynes Port Company
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
17 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; declaration that appellant not validly removed from office; no other relief granted.
Legal Topics
Dismissal of Public Officers, Ministerial Consent for Removal, Transfer of Undertakings, Statutory Employment Rights
Employment Law Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Dismissal of Public Officers Ministerial Consent for Removal Transfer of Undertakings Statutory Employment Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Senan Histon

Plaintiff/appellant

Shannon Foynes Port Company

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was lawfully dismissed without ministerial consent
  2. 2 Whether statutory employment rights regarding tenure and dismissal survived transfer to new company
  3. 3 Whether reporting relationship to chief executive was a protected term of employment

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's statutory right not to be dismissed without the sanction of the Minister for the Marine survived the transfer to the new company, as there was no express statutory provision abolishing this right. Therefore, the purported dismissal was invalid and the appellant remains in office. The reporting relationship to the chief executive is not a protected term of employment.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court order set aside; declaration that appellant not validly removed from office; no other relief granted.

Orders

  • Set aside the order of the High Court.
  • Declare that the appellant has not been validly removed from office in the employment of the respondent.