C.C.K. v S.L.K. (Approved) [2024] IEHC 492 (08 July 2024)

C.C.K. v S.L.K. (Approved) [2024] IEHC 492 (08 July 2024)

Proper provision requires division of family home equity at 45/55 in favour of Respondent, deduction of maintenance arrears from Appellant's share, lump sum payment for future child maintenance, inclusion of half of personal injuries award in asset pool with one-third allocated to Appellant, pension equalisation, and reflection of disclosure failures in asset allocation.

Citation
[2024] IEHC 492
Parties
Applicant/respondent: C. C. K.; Respondent/appellant: S. L. K.
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
08 July 2024
Procedural Posture
Circuit Appeal (family Law Divorce) / Appeal From Circuit Family Court, Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; proper provision adjusted.
Legal Topics
Divorce, Ancillary Relief, Maintenance, Property Division, Pension Equalisation, Disclosure, Litigation Misconduct
Family Law Divorce Ancillary Relief Maintenance Property Division Pension Equalisation Disclosure Litigation Misconduct

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 13
Sign in to unlock

Parties

C. C. K.

Applicant/respondent

S. L. K.

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

Circuit Appeal (family Law Divorce) / Appeal From Circuit Family Court, Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether proper provision was made for spouses and dependent children under the Family Law (Divorce) Act, 1996
  2. 2 Treatment of personal injuries award in asset division
  3. 3 Impact of non-disclosure and litigation misconduct on proper provision

Ratio Decidendi

Proper provision requires division of family home equity at 45/55 in favour of Respondent, deduction of maintenance arrears from Appellant's share, lump sum payment for future child maintenance, inclusion of half of personal injuries award in asset pool with one-third allocated to Appellant, pension equalisation, and reflection of disclosure failures in asset allocation.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; proper provision adjusted.

Orders

  • Respondent to pay Appellant €40,800 for his interest in family home, after deduction of maintenance arrears and asset allocation.
  • Family home to be transferred to Respondent; Respondent responsible for mortgage and repairs.