C.O.S. -v- B.M. [2015] IEHC 836 (18 December 2015)
The Court found that the wife remains in fear of the husband, and that the husband's conduct and lack of insight into his behaviour justify the continuation of the barring order. The husband's compliance with the expired order and absence of recent violence do not negate the wife's ongoing fear. The Court preferred the wife's evidence and affirmed the Circuit Court's order.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 836
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: C. O. S.; Respondent/appellant: B. M.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (family Law Barring Order) / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; Circuit Court order affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Domestic Violence, Barring Order, Judicial Separation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C. O. S.
Applicant/respondent
B. M.
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family Law Barring Order) / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the barring order against the husband should be affirmed or set aside on appeal
- 2 Whether the wife remains in fear justifying continuation of the barring order
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the wife remains in fear of the husband, and that the husband's conduct and lack of insight into his behaviour justify the continuation of the barring order. The husband's compliance with the expired order and absence of recent violence do not negate the wife's ongoing fear. The Court preferred the wife's evidence and affirmed the Circuit Court's order.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; Circuit Court order affirmed
Orders
- Barring order against the husband affirmed; he is restrained from attending at or in the vicinity of the family home or entering the premises until further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment