McCabe v. Ireland [1999] IESC 52; [1999] 4 IR 151; [2000] 1 ILRM 410 (7th July, 1999)
The High Court was correct to direct the trial of preliminary issues of law on the basis that, for the purposes of those issues only, the plaintiff's averments are accepted as true. Discovery may be postponed until after the preliminary issue is determined.
- Citation
- [2000] 1 ILRM 410
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Plaintiff/Appellant; Defendants/respondents: Defendants/Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order for Trial of Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Care, Preliminary Issues, Discovery, Statutory Duty, Negligence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff/Appellant
Plaintiff/appellant
Defendants/Respondents
Defendants/respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order for Trial of Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants owed a duty of care at common law in relation to temporary release of prisoners
- 2 Whether the defendants owed any statutory duties in connection with temporary release of prisoners
- 3 Whether a preliminary issue of law can be tried before establishing all facts
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court was correct to direct the trial of preliminary issues of law on the basis that, for the purposes of those issues only, the plaintiff's averments are accepted as true. Discovery may be postponed until after the preliminary issue is determined.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed
Orders
- Preliminary issues of law to be tried as directed by the High Court
- Discovery of documents postponed to be dealt with by the High Court judge trying the preliminary issues
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment