Lawless v Keatley (Approved) [2025] IEHC 364 (26 June 2025)

Lawless v Keatley (Approved) [2025] IEHC 364 (26 June 2025)

The court found that Mr. Lawless' injury arose from an ordinary everyday mishap for which the employer is not liable, that the alleged unsafe system of work was not properly pleaded, and that even if the incident occurred as claimed, responsibility for ensuring a safe surface lay with Mr. Lawless. The claim was dismissed on all grounds.

Citation
[2025] IEHC 364
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Mark Lawless; Defendant/respondent: Adrian Keatley
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
26 June 2025
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Circuit Court
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Employer's Liability, Personal Injury, Safe System of Work, Pleadings Requirements, Common Sense in Judicial Reasoning
Tort Law Employment Law Employer's Liability Personal Injury Safe System of Work Pleadings Requirements Common Sense in Judicial Reasoning

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mark Lawless

Plaintiff/appellant

Adrian Keatley

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Circuit Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an employer is liable for injuries sustained by an employee during an ordinary everyday task at work
  2. 2 Whether the alleged unsafe system of work was properly pleaded
  3. 3 Whether expert engineering evidence is necessary for ordinary workplace tasks

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Mr. Lawless' injury arose from an ordinary everyday mishap for which the employer is not liable, that the alleged unsafe system of work was not properly pleaded, and that even if the incident occurred as claimed, responsibility for ensuring a safe surface lay with Mr. Lawless. The claim was dismissed on all grounds.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Mr. Lawless' claim is dismissed.
  • Preliminary view that costs in both the High Court and Circuit Court are awarded against Mr. Lawless, subject to further submissions.