Earley -v- Health Service Executive [2017] IECA 157_2 (15 May 2017)
The plaintiff's contract of employment, when read with the job specification, did not permit reassignment from her clinical and operational role to a non-operational post. Clauses allowing for additional duties or changes in location did not authorize a fundamental change in the nature of her job. No implied contractual or statutory power justified the reassignment. The HSE's actions constituted a breach of contract.
- Citation
- [2017] IECA 157_2
- Parties
- Plaintiff / Appellant: Helen Earley; Defendant / Respondent: Health Service Executive
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Contract Dispute (appeal) / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; declaration granted that the reassignment was a breach of contract.
- Legal Topics
- Employment Contract Interpretation, Implied Terms in Contracts, Statutory Powers of Public Bodies, Employee Reassignment, Protected Disclosures, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Helen Earley
Plaintiff / Appellant
Health Service Executive
Defendant / Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Contract Dispute (appeal) / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the HSE lawfully reassigned the plaintiff from her contractual post to a non-operational role
- 2 Whether the contract or statute permitted such reassignment, expressly or by implication
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's contract of employment, when read with the job specification, did not permit reassignment from her clinical and operational role to a non-operational post. Clauses allowing for additional duties or changes in location did not authorize a fundamental change in the nature of her job. No implied contractual or statutory power justified the reassignment. The HSE's actions constituted a breach of contract.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; declaration granted that the reassignment was a breach of contract.
Orders
- Declaration that the reassignment of the plaintiff in July 2015 constituted a breach of her contract of employment.
- Parties invited to make submissions on further relief if necessary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment