Kenny & ors -v- Department of Justice Equality & Law Reform & ors [2014] IEHC 11 (13 January 2014)

Kenny & ors -v- Department of Justice Equality & Law Reform & ors [2014] IEHC 11 (13 January 2014)

The Labour Court erred in accepting the claimants' narrow choice of comparators; valid comparators must be drawn from the generality of Gardaí engaged in clerical duties. Objective justification must address the pay differential itself, not just operational deployment. Industrial relations may be considered but cannot be the sole justification. The matter is remitted to the Labour Court for rehearing in accordance with these principles.

Citation
[2014] IEHC 11
Parties
Appellants/claimants: Margaret Kenny, Patricia Quinn, Nuala Condon, Eileen Norton, Ursula Ennis, Loreta Barrett, Joanne Healy, Kathleen Coyne, Sharon Fitzpatrick, Breda Fitzpatrick, Sandra Hennelly, Marian Troy, Antoinette Fitzpatrick, Helena Gatley; Respondents: Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Department of Finance, Commissioner of An Garda Síochána
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
13 January 2014
Procedural Posture
Appeal on a Point of Law From Labour Court Determination Under Employment Equality Acts / Judgment on Appeal, Remittal to Labour Court
Outcome
Remitted to Labour Court for rehearing in accordance with guidance on comparators and objective justification.
Legal Topics
Equal Pay, Indirect Gender Discrimination, Comparators in Pay Discrimination, Objective Justification, Industrial Relations
Employment Law Equality Law European Union Law Equal Pay Indirect Gender Discrimination Comparators in Pay Discrimination Objective Justification Industrial Relations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Margaret Kenny, Patricia Quinn, Nuala Condon, Eileen Norton, Ursula Ennis, Loreta Barrett, Joanne Healy, Kathleen Coyne, Sharon Fitzpatrick, Breda Fitzpatrick, Sandra Hennelly, Marian Troy, Antoinette Fitzpatrick, Helena Gatley

Appellants/claimants

Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Department of Finance, Commissioner of An Garda Síochána

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal on a Point of Law From Labour Court Determination Under Employment Equality Acts / Judgment on Appeal, Remittal to Labour Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimants are entitled to equal pay with Gardaí performing clerical work on grounds of indirect gender discrimination
  2. 2 What constitutes a valid comparator group for equal pay claims
  3. 3 Whether the pay differential is objectively justified

Ratio Decidendi

The Labour Court erred in accepting the claimants' narrow choice of comparators; valid comparators must be drawn from the generality of Gardaí engaged in clerical duties. Objective justification must address the pay differential itself, not just operational deployment. Industrial relations may be considered but cannot be the sole justification. The matter is remitted to the Labour Court for rehearing in accordance with these principles.

Court Disposition

Remitted to Labour Court for rehearing in accordance with guidance on comparators and objective justification.

Orders

  • Labour Court to select comparators from the generality of Gardaí engaged in clerical duties.
  • Labour Court to determine if claimants' work is like work by reference to valid comparators.