Minister for Justice Equality & Law Reform -v- Gardener [2007] IESC 40 (30 July 2007)
The appeal fails because the appellant was the cause of the delay by failing to attend court, and there is no evidence of a fundamental defect in the UK justice system or any basis for seeking further information under section 20 of the 2003 Act.
- Citation
- [2007] IESC 40
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform; Respondent/appellant: Roger Michael Gardener
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (extradition) / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Order for Surrender Under European Arrest Warrant
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; High Court order for surrender affirmed
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Prosecutorial Delay, Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions, Judicial Cooperation, Extradition Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
Applicant/respondent
Roger Michael Gardener
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (extradition) / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Order for Surrender Under European Arrest Warrant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prosecutorial delay justified refusal of surrender under European Arrest Warrant
- 2 Whether High Court erred in not seeking further information from issuing authority under section 20 of the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal fails because the appellant was the cause of the delay by failing to attend court, and there is no evidence of a fundamental defect in the UK justice system or any basis for seeking further information under section 20 of the 2003 Act.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; High Court order for surrender affirmed
Orders
- Appellant to be surrendered to the United Kingdom under the European Arrest Warrant
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment