Minister for Justice and Equality -v- Lipinski [2016] IECA 145 (12 May 2016)

Minister for Justice and Equality -v- Lipinski [2016] IECA 145 (12 May 2016)

Section 45 and Article 4a do not require a retrial or rehearing for absence at a revocation hearing of conditional release; only absence from trial or sentencing triggers the retrial guarantee. The revocation order enforces, not imposes, the sentence. The European arrest warrant was validly issued based on the original sentence, and surrender is not prohibited by s. 45.

Citation
[2016] IECA 145
Parties
Applicant/respondent: The Minister for Justice and Equality; Respondent/appellant: Arkadiusz Piotr Lipinski
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
12 May 2016
Procedural Posture
European Arrest Warrant Surrender Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; surrender order affirmed.
Legal Topics
European Arrest Warrant, Trial in Absentia, Statutory Interpretation, Conditional Release Revocation
Criminal Law European Law Extradition European Arrest Warrant Trial in Absentia Statutory Interpretation Conditional Release Revocation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Minister for Justice and Equality

Applicant/respondent

Arkadiusz Piotr Lipinski

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

European Arrest Warrant Surrender Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does s. 45 of the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 (as amended) apply where the appellant was absent for the revocation of conditional release but present for trial and sentencing?
  2. 2 Does the right to a retrial extend to a rehearing of the revocation of suspended sentence under the Framework Decision and s. 45?

Ratio Decidendi

Section 45 and Article 4a do not require a retrial or rehearing for absence at a revocation hearing of conditional release; only absence from trial or sentencing triggers the retrial guarantee. The revocation order enforces, not imposes, the sentence. The European arrest warrant was validly issued based on the original sentence, and surrender is not prohibited by s. 45.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; surrender order affirmed.

Orders

  • Order for surrender of Arkadiusz Piotr Lipinski to Poland affirmed.
  • No retrial or rehearing required for revocation hearing absence.