Minister for Justice and Equality -v- O'Connor [2018] IESC 19 (12 March 2018)

Minister for Justice and Equality -v- O'Connor [2018] IESC 19 (12 March 2018)

The Supreme Court determined that the legal questions arising from the UK's impending withdrawal from the EU (Brexit) and its impact on the operation of the European Arrest Warrant system, specifically regarding the enforceability of EU law rights post-surrender, are novel and unresolved. The Court found it necessary to refer these questions to the Court of Justice of the EU for a preliminary ruling, as there is no clear jurisprudence addressing whether surrender should be refused or postponed in light of Brexit-related uncertainties.

Citation
[2018] IESC 19
Parties
Applicant/respondent: Minister for Justice and Equality; Respondent/appellant: Thomas Joseph O’Connor
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
12 March 2018
Procedural Posture
European Arrest Warrant Surrender Proceedings / Supreme Court Appeal; Reference to Court of Justice of the EU
Outcome
Reference to the Court of Justice of the EU for a preliminary ruling
Legal Topics
European Arrest Warrant, Brexit Implications, Surrender of Persons, Rights Under EU Law, Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters
European Union Law Extradition Law Constitutional Law European Arrest Warrant Brexit Implications Surrender of Persons Rights Under EU Law Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Minister for Justice and Equality

Applicant/respondent

Thomas Joseph O’Connor

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

European Arrest Warrant Surrender Proceedings / Supreme Court Appeal; Reference to Court of Justice of the EU

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether surrender under a European Arrest Warrant to the UK is permissible given Brexit and the potential loss of EU law rights post-withdrawal
  2. 2 Whether EU law requires or prohibits surrender in such circumstances
  3. 3 What criteria should be applied to assess risk to rights post-Brexit

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court determined that the legal questions arising from the UK's impending withdrawal from the EU (Brexit) and its impact on the operation of the European Arrest Warrant system, specifically regarding the enforceability of EU law rights post-surrender, are novel and unresolved. The Court found it necessary to refer these questions to the Court of Justice of the EU for a preliminary ruling, as there is no clear jurisprudence addressing whether surrender should be refused or postponed in light of Brexit-related uncertainties.

Court Disposition

Reference to the Court of Justice of the EU for a preliminary ruling

Orders

  • Questions concerning the impact of Brexit on the European Arrest Warrant system and the enforceability of EU law rights post-surrender are referred to the Court of Justice of the EU.
  • Request for expedited procedure under Article 105(1) of the Court’s Rules of Procedure.