Ladbrokes (Irl) Ltd & ors & Companies (Amendment) Act 1990 [2015] IEHC 381 (17 June 2015)
The decision as to what information to provide to potential investors in an examinership is a matter for the commercial judgment of the examiner. The court will not interfere with that judgment unless it is shown to be so unreasonable as to be perverse or made in bad faith. In this case, the examiner's refusal to provide shop-by-shop trading data and other sensitive information to Boylesports was an exercise of commercial judgment, supported by experienced insolvency practitioners, and not so unreasonable as to warrant court intervention. The applicant, as a creditor, had locus standi to bring the application, but the examiner's decision stands.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 381
- Parties
- Company in Examinership: Ladbrokes (Ireland) Limited; Company in Examinership: Ladbrokes Leisure (Ireland) Limited; Company in Examinership: Dara Properties Limited; Applicant/interested Party/creditor: Boylesports; Examiner: Ken Fennell
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Companies (amendment) Act 1990 / Companies Act 2014 / Interlocutory Application During Examinership Process
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Examinership, Disclosure of Commercial Information, Due Diligence, Creditor Rights, Commercial Sensitivity, Standard of Review of Examiner Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ladbrokes (Ireland) Limited
Company in Examinership
Ladbrokes Leisure (Ireland) Limited
Company in Examinership
Dara Properties Limited
Company in Examinership
Boylesports
Applicant/interested Party/creditor
Ken Fennell
Examiner
Procedural Posture
Application Under Companies (amendment) Act 1990 / Companies Act 2014 / Interlocutory Application During Examinership Process
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an examiner is obliged to provide sensitive commercial information to a bona fide potential investor in examinership
- 2 Whether the applicant has locus standi as an interested party/creditor to bring the application
- 3 What is the standard of review for an examiner's commercial judgment in the investment process
Ratio Decidendi
The decision as to what information to provide to potential investors in an examinership is a matter for the commercial judgment of the examiner. The court will not interfere with that judgment unless it is shown to be so unreasonable as to be perverse or made in bad faith. In this case, the examiner's refusal to provide shop-by-shop trading data and other sensitive information to Boylesports was an exercise of commercial judgment, supported by experienced insolvency practitioners, and not so unreasonable as to warrant court intervention. The applicant, as a creditor, had locus standi to bring the application, but the examiner's decision stands.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- The court refused to direct the examiner to provide the requested commercially sensitive information to Boylesports.
- No order was made requiring further disclosure beyond what the examiner had already provided.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment