McAteer v Randleswood (Approved) [2020] IEHC 173 (30 March 2020)
The examiner's remuneration, costs, and expenses, as sanctioned by the court, rank in priority to certified liabilities under s.554(3) of the Companies Act 2014. The examiner is required to justify his claim with sufficient narrative and breakdown, but the level of detail must be proportionate. The examiner did not act irrationally or unreasonably in the conduct or duration of the examinership. There is no basis for apportioning costs to SCGL or for reducing the claim due to alleged prolongation. The application for approval and payment of the examiner's remuneration, outlay, and legal costs is granted, with the examiner's claims ranking ahead of certified liabilities.
- Citation
- [2020] IEHC 173
- Parties
- Applicant/examiner: Michael McAteer; Notice Party/creditor: Randelswood Holdings Limited; Company Under Examinership: Sammon Contracting Ireland Limited; Company Under Examinership: Sammon Contracting Group Limited; Company Under Examinership: Micheál Sammon Woodcraft Limited; Official Liquidator: Stephen Tennant
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Companies Act 2014 (s.554) / Judgment on Examiner's Application for Approval and Payment of Remuneration, Outlay, Legal Costs, and Determination of Priority
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Examinership, Remuneration of Examiner, Priority of Claims, Certified Liabilities, Liquidation, Court Approval of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael McAteer
Applicant/examiner
Randelswood Holdings Limited
Notice Party/creditor
Sammon Contracting Ireland Limited
Company Under Examinership
Sammon Contracting Group Limited
Company Under Examinership
Micheál Sammon Woodcraft Limited
Company Under Examinership
Stephen Tennant
Official Liquidator
Procedural Posture
Application Under Companies Act 2014 (s.554) / Judgment on Examiner's Application for Approval and Payment of Remuneration, Outlay, Legal Costs, and Determination of Priority
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether examiner's remuneration, costs, and expenses rank in priority to certified liabilities under s.529 of the Companies Act 2014
- 2 Whether the examiner provided sufficient evidence to justify the remuneration and costs claimed
- 3 Whether the examiner exceeded his powers in engaging with potential investors
Ratio Decidendi
The examiner's remuneration, costs, and expenses, as sanctioned by the court, rank in priority to certified liabilities under s.554(3) of the Companies Act 2014. The examiner is required to justify his claim with sufficient narrative and breakdown, but the level of detail must be proportionate. The examiner did not act irrationally or unreasonably in the conduct or duration of the examinership. There is no basis for apportioning costs to SCGL or for reducing the claim due to alleged prolongation. The application for approval and payment of the examiner's remuneration, outlay, and legal costs is granted, with the examiner's claims ranking ahead of certified liabilities.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Examiner's remuneration, outlay, and legal costs approved in the amounts claimed.
- Official liquidator authorised to pay examiner's remuneration, outlay, and costs in priority to certified liabilities as and when funds become available.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment