Burmah Castrol/Licence Distributor (Loan Equipment) [1994] IECA 322 (21st April, 1994)
The notified loan equipment agreement, while offending Section 4(1) as it underpins an exclusive distribution arrangement, satisfies the conditions for a licence under Section 4(2) as it contributes to distribution efficiency and does not eliminate competition or impose unnecessary terms.
- Citation
- [1994] IECA 322
- Parties
- Notifier: Burmah Castrol (Ireland) Limited; Counterparty: Distributors of Burmah Castrol (Ireland) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification/decision / Decision on Notification for Certificate or Licence
- Outcome
- Licence granted for notified agreement
- Legal Topics
- Exclusive Distribution Agreements, Loan Equipment Agreements, Section 4 Competition Act 1991, Licensing of Anti Competitive Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Burmah Castrol (Ireland) Limited
Notifier
Distributors of Burmah Castrol (Ireland) Limited
Counterparty
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification/decision / Decision on Notification for Certificate or Licence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the loan equipment agreement constitutes an anti-competitive agreement under Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
- 2 Whether the agreement qualifies for a licence under Section 4(2) of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The notified loan equipment agreement, while offending Section 4(1) as it underpins an exclusive distribution arrangement, satisfies the conditions for a licence under Section 4(2) as it contributes to distribution efficiency and does not eliminate competition or impose unnecessary terms.
Court Disposition
Licence granted for notified agreement
Orders
- Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991 declared inapplicable to the loan equipment agreement between Burmah Castrol (Ireland) Limited and its distributors (notification no. CA/901/92)
- Licence effective from 21 April 1994 to 31 December 1998
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment