Connaught Airport Development Company Limited and Knock Cargo Handling Limited [2000] IECA 583 (29th February, 2000)
The notified agreement does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in the State and therefore does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [2000] IECA 583
- Parties
- Notifying Party: Connaught Airport Development Company Limited; Notifying Party: Knock Cargo Handling Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991
- Outcome
- Certificate granted; agreement does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Legal Topics
- Exclusive Agreements, Cargo Handling Services, Market Entry, Section 4 Competition Act 1991, Ground Handling Services, Council Directive 96/67/ec
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Connaught Airport Development Company Limited
Notifying Party
Knock Cargo Handling Limited
Notifying Party
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification / Decision on Certificate Under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 1991
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the exclusive cargo handling agreement at Knock Airport contravenes Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991 by preventing, restricting, or distorting competition.
Ratio Decidendi
The notified agreement does not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in the State and therefore does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
Certificate granted; agreement does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the agreement for services related to cargo handling at Knock airport dated 6 July 1999 between Connaught Airport Development Company Limited and Knock Cargo Handling Limited does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991, as amended.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment