Fagan v. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation plc [1998] IESC 27 (14th October, 1998)

Fagan v. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation plc [1998] IESC 27 (14th October, 1998)

The insured's claim was grossly exaggerated and fraudulent in several respects, breaching the duty of good faith and General Condition 6 of the policy, entitling the insurer to repudiate liability without prior hearing; fair procedures and constitutional justice were not breached in the context of a commercial insurance contract.

Citation
[1998] IESC 27
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Michael Fagan; Defendant/respondent: General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation plc
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Insurance Claims, Repudiation of Insurance Policy, Duty of Good Faith, Fair Procedures in Contract Repudiation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Fagan

Plaintiff/appellant

General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation plc

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the insurer was entitled to repudiate liability under the policy for alleged fraudulent claim
  2. 2 Whether the insured was denied constitutional justice and fair procedures before repudiation
  3. 3 Whether the insured's claim was fraudulent or grossly exaggerated

Ratio Decidendi

The insured's claim was grossly exaggerated and fraudulent in several respects, breaching the duty of good faith and General Condition 6 of the policy, entitling the insurer to repudiate liability without prior hearing; fair procedures and constitutional justice were not breached in the context of a commercial insurance contract.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Respondents entitled to repudiate liability under the policy
  • Appellant's claim for £46,585.00 dismissed