Criminal Assets Bureau v. McDonnell [2000] IESC 31 (20th December, 2000)
At the date of institution of proceedings, the Defendant's appeal against the inspector's refusal to accept his appeal was still pending, so the assessment was not final and conclusive and the sum was not due and payable. The Plaintiff could not rely on the statutory certificate to prove the debt as due at that time.
- Citation
- [2000] IESC 31
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: The Criminal Assets Bureau; Defendant/appellant: Thomas McDonnell
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax Assessment, Appeals Process, Finality of Tax Assessments, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Criminal Assets Bureau
Plaintiff/respondent
Thomas McDonnell
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tax assessment was final and conclusive at the date of institution of proceedings
- 2 Whether the Plaintiff could rely on statutory certificates as proof of debt due
- 3 Whether the assessment was made under the correct statutory provision
Ratio Decidendi
At the date of institution of proceedings, the Defendant's appeal against the inspector's refusal to accept his appeal was still pending, so the assessment was not final and conclusive and the sum was not due and payable. The Plaintiff could not rely on the statutory certificate to prove the debt as due at that time.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
Orders
- Order of the High Court set aside.
- Action dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment