Criminal Assets Bureau v. Kelly [2002] IESC 72 (11 October 2002)

Criminal Assets Bureau v. Kelly [2002] IESC 72 (11 October 2002)

The appellant was not deprived of access to his assets for the purpose of appealing the tax assessments because he failed to avail of statutory remedies under sections 2(3) and 6 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996. The statutory scheme provided avenues to access funds, and the inability to appeal was due to the appellant's own inaction, not the combined effect of the statutes. Therefore, no constitutional breach arose.

Citation
[2002] IESC 72
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: The Criminal Assets Bureau; Defendant/appellant: John Kelly
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
11 October 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil (tax Recovery) / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Summary Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Income Tax Assessment, Proceeds of Crime, Freezing Order, Right of Appeal, Access to Courts, Locus Standi, Statutory Interpretation
Tax Law Criminal Law Constitutional Law Income Tax Assessment Proceeds of Crime Freezing Order Right of Appeal Access to Courts +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Criminal Assets Bureau

Plaintiff/respondent

John Kelly

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil (tax Recovery) / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the tax assessments were made pursuant to section 922 of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997, triggering section 957(2)(a) appeal procedures
  2. 2 Whether the combined effect of the Criminal Assets Bureau Act 1996, Proceeds of Crime Act 1996, and Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 deprived the appellant of access to assets necessary to appeal, thereby breaching constitutional rights

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant was not deprived of access to his assets for the purpose of appealing the tax assessments because he failed to avail of statutory remedies under sections 2(3) and 6 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996. The statutory scheme provided avenues to access funds, and the inability to appeal was due to the appellant's own inaction, not the combined effect of the statutes. Therefore, no constitutional breach arose.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Summary judgment for the respondent for £378,522.76 (€480,624.76) affirmed
  • No order remitting constitutional issue to High Court