H.A. O'Neil Ltd v Unite the Union & ors (Approved) [2024] IESC 8 (06 March 2024)
There was no proper basis for granting an interlocutory injunction restraining industrial action, as s. 19(2) of the Industrial Relations Act 1990 applied and statutory requirements for lawful industrial action were met; the invalidity of the Sectoral Employment Order removed any continuing basis for the injunction.
- Citation
- [2024] IESC 8
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: H. A. O'Neil Limited; Defendant/appellant: Unite the Union; Defendant/appellant: Patrick James Goold; Defendant/appellant: William Mangan; Defendant/appellant: Damian Jones
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Industrial Action, Injunctions, Trade Union Rights, Sectoral Employment Orders, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
H. A. O'Neil Limited
Plaintiff/respondent
Unite the Union
Defendant/appellant
Patrick James Goold
Defendant/appellant
William Mangan
Defendant/appellant
Damian Jones
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interlocutory injunction restraining industrial action was properly granted under s. 19(2) of the Industrial Relations Act 1990
- 2 Effect of invalid Sectoral Employment Order on lawfulness of industrial action
- 3 Interpretation of statutory protections for trade unions and employees engaging in industrial action
Ratio Decidendi
There was no proper basis for granting an interlocutory injunction restraining industrial action, as s. 19(2) of the Industrial Relations Act 1990 applied and statutory requirements for lawful industrial action were met; the invalidity of the Sectoral Employment Order removed any continuing basis for the injunction.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Interlocutory injunction set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment