A & Ors v The International Protection Appeals Tribunal & Ors (Unapproved) [2024] IECA 133 (29 May 2024)
Article 15 of Directive 2013/33/EU does not confer a right of access to the labour market on a minor applicant for international protection that may be exercised vicariously or by proxy by the minor's parents. The inability of the minor to work is due to age-based restrictions under national law, not a denial of rights. The Directive and national law do not provide for a vicarious or derived right for parents to access the labour market on behalf of a minor applicant. The State's obligation is to provide material reception conditions, not to extend labour market access to parents. No breach of EU or constitutional rights occurred, and no damages are due.
- Citation
- [2024] IECA 133
- Parties
- Applicants/appellants: L. A. (A Minor Suing by His Mother and Next Friend A. A.), A. A. and N. A.; Respondents: The International Protection Appeals Tribunal, The Minister for Justice and Equality, Ireland and the Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- International Protection, Labour Market Access, Rights of Minors, Vicarious Rights, Derived Rights, Reception Conditions Directive, Constitutional Right to Work, Best Interests of the Child, Francovich Damages, Mootness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L. A. (A Minor Suing by His Mother and Next Friend A. A.), A. A. and N. A.
Applicants/appellants
The International Protection Appeals Tribunal, The Minister for Justice and Equality, Ireland and the Attorney General
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 15 of Directive 2013/33/EU confers a right of access to the labour market on a minor applicant for international protection that may be exercised vicariously or by proxy by the minor's parents
- 2 Whether the exclusion of parents of a minor applicant from labour market access is contrary to EU law or the Irish Constitution
- 3 Whether a claim for damages arises for the period during which the parents were denied labour market access
Ratio Decidendi
Article 15 of Directive 2013/33/EU does not confer a right of access to the labour market on a minor applicant for international protection that may be exercised vicariously or by proxy by the minor's parents. The inability of the minor to work is due to age-based restrictions under national law, not a denial of rights. The Directive and national law do not provide for a vicarious or derived right for parents to access the labour market on behalf of a minor applicant. The State's obligation is to provide material reception conditions, not to extend labour market access to parents. No breach of EU or constitutional rights occurred, and no damages are due.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment