Donegal County Council v Quinn & anor (Approved) [2025] IESC 19 (13 May 2025)
A firm of solicitors, as an unincorporated body, is included within the statutory definition of 'person' for the purposes of applying for the issue of a criminal summons on behalf of an authorised prosecutor under s 1 of the Courts (No 3) Act 1986 as amended. There is no contrary intention in the Act to displace the general definition in the Interpretation Act 2005. The requirement to specify the name of the person who applied for the summons may be satisfied by naming the firm acting as agent for the prosecutor. The administrative process does not require the applicant to be a natural person.
- Citation
- [2025] IESC 19
- Parties
- Prosecutor/appellant: Donegal County Council; Accused/respondent: Conor Quinn; Notice Party: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Supreme Court Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Issuing of Summonses, Meaning of 'person' in Statute, Agency in Criminal Procedure, Role of Solicitors in Prosecutions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Donegal County Council
Prosecutor/appellant
Conor Quinn
Accused/respondent
The Attorney General
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Supreme Court Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a firm of solicitors (an unincorporated body) can apply for the issue of a criminal summons on behalf of a body authorised to prosecute under s 1 of the Courts (No 3) Act 1986 as amended
- 2 Whether the term 'person' in the relevant statutory provisions includes unincorporated bodies such as firms of solicitors
Ratio Decidendi
A firm of solicitors, as an unincorporated body, is included within the statutory definition of 'person' for the purposes of applying for the issue of a criminal summons on behalf of an authorised prosecutor under s 1 of the Courts (No 3) Act 1986 as amended. There is no contrary intention in the Act to displace the general definition in the Interpretation Act 2005. The requirement to specify the name of the person who applied for the summons may be satisfied by naming the firm acting as agent for the prosecutor. The administrative process does not require the applicant to be a natural person.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The High Court's decision is set aside.
- It is declared that a firm of solicitors may apply for the issue of a summons on behalf of a body authorised to prosecute under the relevant statutory provisions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment