Dublin Institute of Technology / Joint Purchasing Agreement. [1998] IECA 510 (17th June, 1998)
The notified joint purchasing agreement does not prevent, restrict, or distort competition within the meaning of Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991, due to its limited scope, minor market impact, and member institutions' freedom to purchase outside the scheme.
- Citation
- [1998] IECA 510
- Parties
- Party to Agreement: RTC Athlone; Party to Agreement: RTC Carlow; Party to Agreement: RTC Cork; Party to Agreement: Dublin Institute of Technology; Party to Agreement: RTC Dundalk; Party to Agreement: RTC Dun Laoghaire; Party to Agreement: RTC Galway; Party to Agreement: RTC Letterkenny; Party to Agreement: RTC Limerick; Party to Agreement: RTC Sligo; Party to Agreement: RTC Tallaght; Party to Agreement: Tipperary Rural and Business Development Institute; Party to Agreement: RTC Tralee; Party to Agreement: Waterford Institute of Technology
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Notification Decision / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Certificate issued; agreement does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Legal Topics
- Joint Purchasing Agreements, Section 4 Competition Act 1991, Definition of Undertakings, Market Impact Assessment, Group Buying Arrangements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RTC Athlone
Party to Agreement
RTC Carlow
Party to Agreement
RTC Cork
Party to Agreement
Dublin Institute of Technology
Party to Agreement
RTC Dundalk
Party to Agreement
RTC Dun Laoghaire
Party to Agreement
RTC Galway
Party to Agreement
RTC Letterkenny
Party to Agreement
RTC Limerick
Party to Agreement
RTC Sligo
Party to Agreement
RTC Tallaght
Party to Agreement
Tipperary Rural and Business Development Institute
Party to Agreement
RTC Tralee
Party to Agreement
Waterford Institute of Technology
Party to Agreement
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Notification Decision / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether joint purchasing agreement among third-level institutions contravenes Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
- 2 Whether participating institutions are undertakings under the Act
- 3 Whether the agreement prevents, restricts, or distorts competition
Ratio Decidendi
The notified joint purchasing agreement does not prevent, restrict, or distort competition within the meaning of Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991, due to its limited scope, minor market impact, and member institutions' freedom to purchase outside the scheme.
Court Disposition
Certificate issued; agreement does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the joint purchasing arrangements among the fourteen third-level educational institutions do not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment