Emmett Corcoran and Oncor Ventures Ltd t/a The Democrat v The Commissioner of An Garda Siochana and the Director of Public Prosecutions (Approved) [2023] IESC 15 (22 June 2023)

Emmett Corcoran and Oncor Ventures Ltd t/a The Democrat v The Commissioner of An Garda Siochana and the Director of Public Prosecutions (Approved) [2023] IESC 15 (22 June 2023)

The Supreme Court held that the District Judge, when considering an application for a search warrant under s. 10 of the 1997 Act in respect of a journalist or media organisation, must be informed that journalistic privilege is engaged and must conduct a balancing exercise between the public interest in investigation and the rights of journalists under the Constitution and Article 10 ECHR. The statutory regime must provide adequate legal safeguards, including independent judicial assessment before access to journalistic material. Ex post judicial review is not a sufficient safeguard if it does not guarantee review before material is accessed. As the District Judge in this case was not...

Citation
[2023] IESC 15
Parties
Applicant/respondent: Emmett Corcoran; Applicant/respondent: Oncor Ventures Ltd t/a The Democrat; Respondent/appellant: The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána; Respondent/appellant: The Director of Public Prosecutions
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
22 June 2023
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Supreme Court Appeal From Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; Court of Appeal order affirmed
Legal Topics
Journalistic Privilege, Search Warrants, Freedom of Expression, Protection of Sources, Article 10 ECHR, Article 40.6.1° Constitution, Procedural Safeguards, Balancing of Rights
Constitutional Law Criminal Law Media Law Human Rights Journalistic Privilege Search Warrants Freedom of Expression Protection of Sources +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Emmett Corcoran

Applicant/respondent

Oncor Ventures Ltd t/a The Democrat

Applicant/respondent

The Commissioner of An Garda Síochána

Respondent/appellant

The Director of Public Prosecutions

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Supreme Court Appeal From Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether s. 10 of the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1997 permits or requires the District Court to balance public interest in crime investigation against journalistic privilege when issuing search warrants
  2. 2 Whether ex post judicial review is a sufficient safeguard for journalistic privilege under the Constitution and Article 10 ECHR
  3. 3 Whether the Gardaí were obliged to make full disclosure of all relevant facts, including the assertion of journalistic privilege, to the District Judge when seeking a warrant

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the District Judge, when considering an application for a search warrant under s. 10 of the 1997 Act in respect of a journalist or media organisation, must be informed that journalistic privilege is engaged and must conduct a balancing exercise between the public interest in investigation and the rights of journalists under the Constitution and Article 10 ECHR. The statutory regime must provide adequate legal safeguards, including independent judicial assessment before access to journalistic material. Ex post judicial review is not a sufficient safeguard if it does not guarantee review before material is accessed. As the District Judge in this case was not...

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; Court of Appeal order affirmed

Orders

  • Search warrant issued on 2 April 2019 quashed
  • Gardaí not entitled to access any information obtained pursuant to the warrant