T.D. -v- Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform [2014] IESC 29 (10 April 2014)

T.D. -v- Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform [2014] IESC 29 (10 April 2014)

The Supreme Court held that the 14-day limitation period in s.5(2)(a) of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000 is not incompatible with the EU law principles of equivalence and effectiveness. The limitation period applies equally to challenges based on national and EU law, and the appropriate comparator is a challenge to an asylum decision on constitutional or national law grounds, which is also subject to the same 14-day period. The discretion to extend time further supports compliance with EU law. The High Court erred in finding a breach of the principles of equivalence and effectiveness.

Citation
[2014] IESC 29
Parties
Respondents: TD, ND (a minor suing by her mother and next friend TD) and AD (a minor suing by his mother and next friend TD); Appellants: Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Attorney General and Ireland
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
10 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Appeal (judicial Review) / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Grant of Leave for Judicial Review
Outcome
Appeal allowed; High Court decision set aside.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Time Limits, Principle of Equivalence, Principle of Effectiveness, Asylum Law, Procedural Autonomy
Immigration Law European Union Law Administrative Law Judicial Review Time Limits Principle of Equivalence Principle of Effectiveness Asylum Law +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

TD, ND (a minor suing by her mother and next friend TD) and AD (a minor suing by his mother and next friend TD)

Respondents

Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Attorney General and Ireland

Appellants

Procedural Posture

Appeal (judicial Review) / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court Grant of Leave for Judicial Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 14-day limitation period in s.5(2)(a) of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000 is incompatible with the EU law principles of equivalence and effectiveness when applied to judicial review of a refusal of refugee status.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the 14-day limitation period in s.5(2)(a) of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000 is not incompatible with the EU law principles of equivalence and effectiveness. The limitation period applies equally to challenges based on national and EU law, and the appropriate comparator is a challenge to an asylum decision on constitutional or national law grounds, which is also subject to the same 14-day period. The discretion to extend time further supports compliance with EU law. The High Court erred in finding a breach of the principles of equivalence and effectiveness.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; High Court decision set aside.

Orders

  • The grant of leave to apply for judicial review is set aside.
  • The 14-day limitation period in s.5(2)(a) of the Illegal Immigrants (Trafficking) Act 2000 is not incompatible with EU law.