Kerins -v- McGuinness & ors [2015] IECA 267 (10 December 2015)
Discovery of documents is not relevant or necessary for determination of the jurisdictional issues in this judicial review; jurisdictional issues must be determined first, and applications for discovery are to be adjourned until after such determination.
- Citation
- [2015] IECA 267
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: Angela Kerins; Respondent/appellant: Deputy John McGuinness; Respondent/appellant: Deputy Mary Lou McDonald; Respondent/appellant: Deputy Shane Ross; Respondent/appellant: Deputy Áine Collins; Respondent/appellant: Deputy Paul J. Connaughton; Respondent/appellant: Deputy John Deasy; Respondent/appellant: Deputy Robert Dowds; Respondent/appellant: Deputy Seán Fleming; Respondent/appellant: Deputy Simon Harris; Respondent/appellant: Deputy Eoghan Murphy; Respondent/appellant: Deputy Gerald Nash; Respondent/appellant: Deputy Derek Nolan; Respondent/appellant: Deputy Kieran O’Donnell; Respondent/appellant: The Clerk of Dáil Éireann; Respondent/appellant: The Clerk of the Public Accounts Committee; Respondent/appellant: Ireland; Respondent/appellant: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order for Discovery
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court order for discovery set aside; applications for discovery adjourned until after determination of jurisdictional issues.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Discovery, Parliamentary Privilege, Jurisdiction, Misfeasance in Public Office
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angela Kerins
Applicant/respondent
Deputy John McGuinness
Respondent/appellant
Deputy Mary Lou McDonald
Respondent/appellant
Deputy Shane Ross
Respondent/appellant
Deputy Áine Collins
Respondent/appellant
Deputy Paul J. Connaughton
Respondent/appellant
Deputy John Deasy
Respondent/appellant
Deputy Robert Dowds
Respondent/appellant
Deputy Seán Fleming
Respondent/appellant
Deputy Simon Harris
Respondent/appellant
Deputy Eoghan Murphy
Respondent/appellant
Deputy Gerald Nash
Respondent/appellant
Deputy Derek Nolan
Respondent/appellant
Deputy Kieran O’Donnell
Respondent/appellant
The Clerk of Dáil Éireann
Respondent/appellant
The Clerk of the Public Accounts Committee
Respondent/appellant
Ireland
Respondent/appellant
The Attorney General
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order for Discovery
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether discovery of documents should be ordered in judicial review proceedings prior to determination of jurisdictional issues
- 2 Whether the Public Accounts Committee had jurisdiction to conduct the inquiry into payments by the Rehab Group
- 3 Whether the manner of examination deprived the PAC of jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
Discovery of documents is not relevant or necessary for determination of the jurisdictional issues in this judicial review; jurisdictional issues must be determined first, and applications for discovery are to be adjourned until after such determination.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court order for discovery set aside; applications for discovery adjourned until after determination of jurisdictional issues.
Orders
- Order remitting and adjourning applications for discovery before the High Court until after determination of jurisdictional issues.
- High Court order refusing documents at paras. (v) and (vi) vacated; application adjourned until after determination of jurisdictional issues.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment