AJK v The Minister for Defence [2020] IECA 64 (28 February 2020)
The Minister for Defence retains responsibility and a power of review over the performance of the Chief of Staff in relation to enlistment decisions under the Defence Act 1954. The Minister's decision of 31 January 2018 was a final, reviewable decision amenable to judicial review. Neither s.53(1) of the Defence Act 1954 nor DFR A10 recruiting regulations preclude the appellant's enlistment on the basis of his subsidiary protection status or limited residency permission.
- Citation
- [2020] IECA 64
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: AJK; Defendant/respondent: The Minister for Defence
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Delegation of Statutory Powers, Eligibility for Enlistment, Subsidiary Protection, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AJK
Plaintiff/appellant
The Minister for Defence
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister for Defence has the power to review enlistment decisions made by military authorities under the Defence Act 1954 and related regulations
- 2 Whether the Minister's decision of 31 January 2018 is amenable to judicial review
- 3 Whether the appellant is precluded from enlistment by s.53(1) of the Defence Act 1954 or DFR A10 recruiting regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The Minister for Defence retains responsibility and a power of review over the performance of the Chief of Staff in relation to enlistment decisions under the Defence Act 1954. The Minister's decision of 31 January 2018 was a final, reviewable decision amenable to judicial review. Neither s.53(1) of the Defence Act 1954 nor DFR A10 recruiting regulations preclude the appellant's enlistment on the basis of his subsidiary protection status or limited residency permission.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- Declaration that the Minister's decision of 31 January 2018 is amenable to judicial review
- Declaration that neither s.53(1) of the Defence Act 1954 nor DFR A10 preclude the appellant's enlistment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment