Ringaskiddy & Distirct Residents Association & ors -v- EPA & ors [2008] IESC 55 (31 July 2008)
The appellants failed to establish a substantial or material risk of conflicting decisions between the national courts and the Court of Justice, as no proceedings had yet been commenced by the Commission and the legal basis of any such proceedings was unknown. The interests of justice and the need for expedition in long-standing proceedings outweighed speculative risks of conflict. The appeal against the refusal to grant a stay or adjournment was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2008] IESC 55
- Parties
- Applicants/appellants: Mary O’Leary & Others; Respondents: An Bord Pleanala, Ireland and the Attorney General; Notice Party: Indaver NV, trading as Indaver Ireland & Others; Applicant/appellant: Ringaskiddy and District Residents’ Association Limited; Respondents: Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland and the Attorney General; Notice Parties: Indaver NV, trading as Indaver Ireland & Others
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (interlocutory) / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Refusal of Stay/adjournment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Planning Permission, Waste Licence, Transposition of EU Directives, Adjournment of Proceedings, Potential Conflict With EU Law, Community Law Primacy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary O’Leary & Others
Applicants/appellants
An Bord Pleanala, Ireland and the Attorney General
Respondents
Indaver NV, trading as Indaver Ireland & Others
Notice Party
Ringaskiddy and District Residents’ Association Limited
Applicant/appellant
Environmental Protection Agency, Ireland and the Attorney General
Respondents
Indaver NV, trading as Indaver Ireland & Others
Notice Parties
Procedural Posture
Appeal (interlocutory) / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Refusal of Stay/adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether national proceedings should be adjourned pending potential infringement proceedings by the European Commission against Ireland regarding transposition of the EIA Directive
- 2 Whether there is a substantial risk of conflicting decisions between national courts and the Court of Justice of the European Communities
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants failed to establish a substantial or material risk of conflicting decisions between the national courts and the Court of Justice, as no proceedings had yet been commenced by the Commission and the legal basis of any such proceedings was unknown. The interests of justice and the need for expedition in long-standing proceedings outweighed speculative risks of conflict. The appeal against the refusal to grant a stay or adjournment was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Refusal to grant stay or adjournment affirmed
- Proceedings to continue in the High Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment